Post your resource here, in whatever state it is in.
Say which format you chose and why that one rather than the others. Then the reflection: how it aligns with your outcomes, how it works in all three modes, what AI contributed and what you changed.
Post the edit you are least sure about. Everyone shares what worked; almost nobody shares the decision they are still second-guessing, and that is the one your colleagues can actually help with.
Three hundred to five hundred words.
How to reply so that it is useful
Read at least one other post before you write your own, and answer it in three short parts:
1. What works: name one specific choice in the post that would help their students, and say why.
2. What worries you: point to one place where a learner in a different mode, especially the asynchronous one, could be left out, and suggest a fix.
3. What you would borrow: one idea you will take into your own course, and how you would adapt it.
Post your own contribution as text in the message field rather than as an attachment, so that colleagues can read it without downloading. This is a practice task and it is not graded; the programme team reads every thread and replies where a discussion stalls.
