Post your resource audit here.
Copy the reflection you wrote in step four of the lesson. Say which resource you chose, how it scored against the five criteria, and what you are actually going to change before next term.
Then read at least two other posts and reply to one. Name the criterion they handled well, and one adaptation you would add.
There is no word limit, but three hundred words is usually enough.
How to reply so that it is useful
Read at least one other post before you write your own, and answer it in three short parts:
1. What works: name one specific choice in the post that would help their students, and say why.
2. What worries you: point to one place where a learner in a different mode, especially the asynchronous one, could be left out, and suggest a fix.
3. What you would borrow: one idea you will take into your own course, and how you would adapt it.
Post your own contribution as text in the message field rather than as an attachment, so that colleagues can read it without downloading. This is a practice task and it is not graded; the programme team reads every thread and replies where a discussion stalls.
.
