This topic belongs to Lesson 4. You chose an anonymised student product from your course, generated feedback on it with an AI tool, analysed the feedback with the guiding questions (aligned with the learning outcomes; specific, actionable and understandable; helpful for an asynchronous learner; risks or gaps), and redesigned it with your pedagogical expertise.
Post your short report here as text, in four parts: the original AI-generated feedback; your critique; your revised version; and your reflection summary: when you would use AI feedback in your course, and what conditions must be in place for it to be effective and ethical. Remove or anonymise any personal or identifiable information before posting.
Then read a colleague’s report and comment on it.
How to reply so that it is useful
Read at least one other post before you write your own, and answer it in three short parts:
1. What works: name one specific choice in the post that would help their students, and say why.
2. What worries you: point to one place where a learner in a different mode, especially the asynchronous one, could be left out, and suggest a fix.
3. What you would borrow: one idea you will take into your own course, and how you would adapt it.
Post your own contribution as text in the message field rather than as an attachment, so that colleagues can read it without downloading. This is a practice task and it is not graded; the programme team reads every thread and replies where a discussion stalls.
