This topic belongs to Lesson 2. The partners’ tool selection activity: choose a HyFlex evaluation framework (Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels or Beatty’s HyFlex principles), select two tools (for example survey plus LMS analytics), and write a short plan of 300 to 400 words describing how you would use them to evaluate a HyFlex course in your own context.
Post the plan here as text, with the framework and the two tools named at the top, and the third source your triangulation check suggested at the end. Then respond to at least one colleague’s plan, suggesting an additional tool or a refinement.
How to reply so that it is useful
Read at least one other post before you write your own, and answer it in three short parts:
1. What works: name one specific choice in the post that would help their students, and say why.
2. What worries you: point to one place where a learner in a different mode, especially the asynchronous one, could be left out, and suggest a fix.
3. What you would borrow: one idea you will take into your own course, and how you would adapt it.
Post your own contribution as text in the message field rather than as an attachment, so that colleagues can read it without downloading. This is a practice task and it is not graded; the programme team reads every thread and replies where a discussion stalls.
